While I could go on for pages about the answer to “How to Get a Patent for an Idea” (and I actually do here), the real answer to this question is: you can’t.
That’s right, you can’t get a patent for an “idea” alone, not even the best idea in the world!
Only inventions are worthy of patent protection, and while some may think this is a vague distinction between ideas and inventions, I’m going to point out the key differences, and I think it’s a perfect place to start the glorious topic that I have dedicated my career to and fallen in love with: how to get a patent for an invention.
Since this article is more like a novel, I have included a table of contents/navigation menu below and at the conclusion.
Feel free to click on any of the 13 steps to quickly find the answer you are looking for!
It is my hope that this guide helps you protect and bring to market your visionary idea!
“People who are crazy enough to think they can change the world, are the ones who do.” – Steve Jobs
Ideas are Dime-a-Dozen.
When giving legal advice to a first-time inventor or business owner, I know it hurts when I must tell them this fact, that “ideas are a dime-a-dozen.”
Now, this usually comes up after I have just had a brief discussion with them, so it’s not always true that they only have an idea, they may have more. However, even though I know it might sting, I do it anyway, because they need to hear it.
I let them know that most inventors start with an idea, and they let it roll around a while in their head first before acting or fleshing it out further.
Here are 3 steps to better understand if you have an IDEA or INVENTION. Click here to further learn if your idea is patentable.
1. You Need To Gain Appreciation for Patents!
The reason I stress this fact up front with inventors is that I want them to understand and appreciate what patents get granted for. It takes a long time before inventors fully grasp the idea of the patent process, and the actual document and the claims that they have legal rights to if the patent application gets granted.
- Ideas are fanciful creations of the mind, usually born of emotion and problem solving and are exciting.
- Inventions are things, processes, or methods that are fully described in their physical form by function, usually are quite dry, unemotional, and explanatory in nature.
The former, is what gets the blood moving, and people excited to start businesses, and triggers the entrepreneurial bug inside inventors…don’t get me wrong, I love to hear the emotion and excitement in inventors’ voices but we need to think about the “dry aspects” of starting your business as well.
Not everything is cherries and roses!
Listen to my three series video playlist on “The Claim Set in a Patent Application” if you want to learn more!
2. Recognize you are courageous for acting on your idea!
Another reason I love to point out how ideas are “dime-a-dozen” is to point out how courageous you are being by acting.
It’s more common that we think, that everyday people have creative, fun ideas, but fail to act on them for whatever reason. They tell themselves that they don’t have the time, or funding, or background, or business skills.
Whatever the excuse is, I admire the inventor for taking the steps to bring their visionary idea to reality. By reading this blog article right now you have taken the first step needed to protecting, bringing to market, and monetizing your idea.
Give yourself a pat on the back for being “Bold and Brave!”
3. Be honest with yourself. Are you up for the challenge?
Taking an idea and making it a reality is hard.
Challenging inventors, as I have found, is one of the best ways to get them to step up their game and perform at their best.
When working with our clients I like to test them with the statement, where I call (what might be their invention) merely an idea.
The first key way inventors respond to this is by giving me some drawings, and examples of how their invention would work or could work. They tell me about how feasible it would be to build a prototype, and describe the materials they would need to gather, and in what order they would need to assemble the device, or what component systems would be required for the idea to work.
All the while, as they vigorously provide me information to prove their idea is not merely an idea, but an invention, I smile, because after a while, they are right!
Once an idea has been described in such detail so that someone that is in the same industry or field of technology could build their idea just by reading the written description and viewing the drawings – they have just identified an invention.
Be honest with yourself. Have you put in the work? Do you understand what it takes? If so… keep reading!
In Summary – Do You Have An Idea or Invention?
Before moving forward with an idea, go forward with these 3-steps to better understand if you have an idea or invention.
- Gain appreciate for patents.
- Recognize your courageousness.
- Be honest with yourself. Are you up for the challenge?
I would also highly recommend you speak to a patent attorney and fully disclose your idea in as much detail as possible when attempting to get a patent for an idea. (Make sure they sign a confidentiality agreement to ensure if you are on to something and promise to keep it confidential.)
The goal is so you can get another person’s perspective on whether you have enough information about the idea to constitute an invention.
When having the discussion please enter it with an open mind. Many times I speak with clients and try to give them helpful advice but they are stuck in their ways making assumptions with regard to the surrounding technology. Take the critique, it might end up saving you thousands of dollars and hours of wasted work.
As I’ll discuss in great detail below, these legal opinions will be the basis for all major decisions you will make in terms of whether and how you will be able to monetize your invention in the marketplace.
So, you’ve got an invention, time to get a patent for the idea right?
First, you should ask yourself if you should even try to patent it. Is your invention patentable?
The patent statute, 35 USC 101 tells us that any:
“new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof is eligible for patent protection.”
While that list of what is eligible seems quite broad (and it is), there are some things that clearly fall outside of that definition and has been solid agreement from courts over the years.
Laws of nature and natural phenomena are inherently not new, and by definition are created not by man, but by nature. Therefore, discoveries or findings or mathematical equations, proofs (such as E=MC²) are not patent eligible. But, it’s everything else that has created a massive gray area in the law for the past century or more.
Especially given the technology innovations around computers and computer-implemented inventions, there are more questions now about what is eligible (does it qualify?) than whether something is patentable (is my invention novel and non-obvious?).
For every inventor, there are some major threshold questions that need to be considered if your invention involves computer-implemented technology or even if it has potential applications with computer-related technologies.
Even those inventors who create new devices, made up entirely of physical components, with no use of electronic or computer-implemented technology – it is STILL important to consider novel applications or adaptations of your invention using computer-implemented technologies because of how pervasive computers have become in every step of manufacturing, assembly, delivery, tracking, quality, performance, and lifecycle of every conceivable product made today.
Get an Eligibility Opinion
So, if you’ve got an invention, and you appreciate the importance of assessing eligibility, now what do you do?
You need to seek an Eligibility Opinion from a licensed and registered USPTO Patent Attorney, who understands the recent case law and can help you decide whether to go down the patent route or find another. Your attorney will probably not tell you in black and white terms “you should seek a patent on this,” or “you shouldn’t seek a patent on this.” Instead, you will receive a careful opinion which covers different aspects of your invention and places weight on certain characteristics to give you a level of risk to proceed.
With so much changing in the courts, and with the USPTO examiners, there is no way to be 100% certain about anything, so the opinion will just give opinions on risk and it will be up to you whether you proceed.
If you are interested in learning more about what to look for please watch my video series on Software Patent Eligibility. This is an important step in the “How to Get an Patent for Your Idea” process.
After you talk with your Patent Attorney, and signs point to Eligibility, you are on your way to getting a patent for your idea! There are some big questions to address right up front, so that they don’t trip you up down the road.
The first of which is inventorship.
This question gets at the heart of the innovation and asks:
“Who invented this? Were there any third parties, contractors, developers, employees involved in the conception of the invention?”
These questions will become very important as the inventor prepares to provide a required oath disclosing all known inventors, under 37 CFR 1.66.
A question that comes up a lot is about individuals or entities that helped to create a prototype or developers that made the software.
The simple answer is that these people are likely NOT the real inventors.
While there likely is some creative element to coming up with the physical manifestation of the design, prototype or working software model – they are not the inventor, or the one(s) who conceived of the invention and should not be named as inventors. For many companies that are working on large-scale innovations that are breakthroughs, Inventorship Opinions are sought from Patent Attorneys, who will, by an investigation, record analysis, and interviews, decide who to name as the rightful inventor.
Whether through admission, knowledge or through discovery via the inventorship inquiry above, it is critical to identify all co-inventors prior to filing a patent application. In fact, all co-inventors must be named on patent applications by law.
Co-inventors, get equal rights as any of the inventors to have exclusivity to the ENTIRE invention to prevent any (non-inventor) in the applicable jurisdiction from making, using, selling or importing the invention.
That also means that no co-inventor can prohibit another co-inventor from exercising their rights to exclude others from making, using, selling, or importing the invention. These rules are true so long as the inventor has not assigned their invention to another individual or entity (see patent assignments).
If you’ve co-developed or think you are unsure about who the inventors are in your project, please seek an attorney to give you Patent Inventorship Opinion.
Who has ownership?
By default, the owner of the patent rights is the inventor, or, as discussed above, all of the co-inventors, equally.
However, as is the case for a majority of inventions, they are developed while being employed by a company. Usually, companies require employees to sign an employment contract upon hiring on and in there is usually an assignment of intellectual property clause.
What this clause says is that so long as you are an employee, for any intellectual property that you develop while on the job or within the scope of your job assignment, belongs to the company.
Thus, there is an automatic obligation for an employee-inventor to assign the invention rights over to the company.
It becomes critical to understand if you as the inventor are either:
- Inventing on behalf of the company (if its related to your job, if you’ve worked on the invention on-hours, using the company’s resources) or…
- If it is more like your own personal invention (not related to your job description, has been worked off hours, not using employer’s equipment/resources).
This inquiry can be quite detailed and an opinion on invention ownership can be an important thing to discuss with your local State-barred Patent Attorney. I mention state-barred, because this opinion will necessarily include an analysis of state employment law (which is state-specific) as well as patent law.
It is not the end of the story if your employer will own the patent rights, as you have the freedom to contract with your employer, should you decide to leave the company to have a license to make/use/sell the invention for example.
However, if the invention is under obligation to be assigned to your employer, you should notify your Patent Attorney, and at least make your boss foot the bill!
Before jumping head-first into a patent project, it is very important to take some time to make sure that the ends will justify the means. In other words, what are your goals?
For most entrepreneurs, it is to make money!
And of course, there are countless underlying reasons for wanting more money, but that’s for another discussion elsewhere. So, if the goal for a majority of inventors is to make money, the question becomes will you make a reasonable return on your investment?
Otherwise, the entire venture is foolhardy. In order to see this big-picture, an inventor must remove themselves from the functions and performance and details of their invention (the tree) and zoom way back so that they can see the opportunity (or lack thereof) from a commercial point of view (the forest) before they continue pursuing the solution.
If that is the case… you are probably going to want to check out my video series on Monetizing your Patents.
There are many patent eligible, novel, and non-obvious inventions that have been pursued without a forest-view.
Meaning, the market size and opportunity wasn’t worth the time and/or monetary investment into seeking patent protection in the first place.
In other words, had those inventors actually thought about how much they could possibly make if their product sold to as many potential customers as there are, would they make the return they are looking for?
For many inventions (and those we’ve likely seen on the As-Seen-On-TV ads) the answer is no. Now, in a very candid analysis, the people that did get paid on those ventures were the attorneys!
The attorneys got their legal bills paid, to help them research, draft and prosecute the patent claims through the USPTO (note that average cost to prosecute a patent average well over $25,000). The moral here is to not let the Patent Attorney be the only one that profits from an innovation.
Before we jump into the nuts and bolts of patentability – I want to make sure we talk about the BIG no-nos in the patent world. EARLY DISCLOSURE KILLS PATENTS.
This may not come as a surprise to seasoned professionals that know IP is key to competing at the highest levels, but for many newbies and especially millennials – they grew up on a notion of sharing, open-source, and crowd-funding.
As you will see below, if you disclose your invention to the public in the wrong way, prior to filing your patent application you stand to lose the ability to claim your invention for yourself – you’ve given it to the public, without any recourse for monetary gain! Thanks a lot!
You have ONE Year in the U.S.
The United States’ patent statute provides a one-year limited grace period for inventors to have published their invention before it becomes dedicated to the public domain. This means that if you publish your invention (take to trade show, put it on Kickstarter, pitch your business and technology at an angel convention, etc.) you’ve started that one-year timer.
You should feel fortunate, as there are many countries in the world for which no grace period exists – these are called “absolute novelty” countries. Each country has their own rules about whether disclosure prior to patent filing is permissible.
That means, that as soon as you open your big mouth in front of investors, publish your invention in a trade journal, take it to a show, present to a panel of sharks, etc. you’ve potentially lost your rights in many countries to have exclusivity to make, use, and sell there. OUCH!
Another trigger that can start the one-year grace period is called an “on sale” activity. Whenever you make a sale, or even offer to sell your patented product or service, that TOO starts the one-year grace period in the US and may cause you to lose rights in those absolute novelty countries.
There is a Saving Grace to this situation, however…
The only way to assure that the dreaded ONE year clock does NOT start ticking, is if your disclosure to a 3rd party is under a signed confidentiality agreement.
This is a contract, much like any other contract, and it should be taken quite seriously, and an attorney should be hired to assure that it will be binding and enforceable on all parties who are signatures on it.
A major downside to the Confidentiality Agreement (also called a Nondisclosure Agreement or NDA) is that you’re relying on a contract to save your invention. If the other party breaches the contract and shares your invention with someone else – your only recourse is to fight the legal battle to enforce your contract…and now you’ve lost precious time and resources toward what you really should be focused on: getting your patent application filed and protected!
There is also the Real Answer to this situation…
File your Patent Application
Instead of relying on an NDA to protect your interest and confidentiality, unless its absolutely required to bring someone else into the project for funding, or additional technical consideration – you should work with a registered USPTO Patent Attorney to get your patent application filed, to get your all-important FILING DATE. Then, you can share your invention with anyone and everyone without any worry about confidentiality.
That’s the real beauty of filing a patent application is that you are “patent pending,” and it relieves the inventor of having to worry about showing all of their cards. Finally, they can tell would-be investors about the “secret sauce” they have and how their solution is better than the competition. Most inventors I work with really enjoy this stage, as the opportunities seem to open up before them after filing. A weight is lifted off their shoulders.
Don’t go Crazy. Share Only what was Filed.
Yes, the freedom of having patent pending status is exciting, and relieving – but you can’t go flapping your gums about everything. You must only disclose to 3rd parties what you filed in the patent application.
This means, that any improvements you’ve come across, any potential new applications, or alternative embodiments you have come across in user studies, or feedback from customers MUST REMAIN CONFIDENTIAL.
You should treat each improvement (no matter how subtle) as close to your chest as a new invention (because it may very well be).
The way patents are monetized is by enforcing them, and the best way to enforce a technology is not with just one patent, but with a portfolio of patents that cover a broad area/swath of the industry and market.
Thus, these improvements you have begun to see should be protected separately to further expand your protection and also elongate your timeline of protection beyond the 20 years of the initial patent. Continuation patent applications can be filed to help protect certain aspects/functionality of your invention beyond the duration of the original core patent.
Wrapping up Disclosure
So, enough about disclosure – we’ve covered the bases and then some. As long as you are clear about when and (more likely) when NOT to disclose your invention, we’re good.
If you are in good standing with regard to disclosure and making sure you are not completely barred from patenting, the next inquiry is more substantive – novelty and non-obviousness – just ahead.
I’ve created a chart that has been instrumental in how I’m able to relate the importance of having a plan in place for making a return on investment for an innovation.
I tell inventors that simply having a patent granted does not bring you money – you have to go to market and make it happen.
The lightbulb in the inventor’s eye doesn’t really go off until I show them the matrix.
Money Doesn’t Magically Show up When You Get a Patent
It is a common misconception that inventors and business people have, that as soon as an invention is granted a Patent from the USPTO, that interested tech companies will come knocking at the door looking to license your invention or buy the technology.
Or, that magically there will be a massive demand for it and customers will be out looking for the invented product.
For as long as Bold Patents has been around, our Patent Attorneys have enlightened inventors to understand the bigger picture and challenged them, right from the onset, that they should fully understand that it takes both a new technology and a solid business plan to make any product or service have a lasting impact on the economy.
The Patent Success Matrix was created to help these inventors, entrepreneurs, and business owners see that marketability (the economic viability) is just as important as the patentability (the ability to get a patent) when it comes to having a successful invention.
The first axis of the Patent Success Matrix is Patentability, which is the likelihood that your invention will become a granted patent. It measures the degree to which the invention is novel (new) and nonobvious (different) as compared to other innovations in the same industry.
There are three big considerations to make under this patentability analysis.
- Eligibility (35 USC 101). We’ve discussed eligibility above, and this weighs higher for those inventions that have very little if any risk to being assessed as “abstract ideas.”
- Novelty (35 USC 102) which assess how new your invention is as compared to prior art.
- Non-obviousness (35 USC 103) assesses whether your invention is an obvious variant of prior art. The more eligible, novel, and non-obvious, the higher the score will be on the vertical (patentability) axis.
The second axis of the Patent Success Matrix is Marketability, which is the overall monetary opportunity for your invention.
There are three indices that make up the overall marketability score:
- The first is based on the industry and size to quantify/predict the demand for the product/service and.
- The second is the level of competition in the market to see how many competitors there are, how mature they are and how spread out they are.
- Lastly, the marketability analysis considers the barriers to entry – which are legal, financial, governmental or credential-based barriers to getting started. So, the larger the size of market, the fewer competitors, the lower the barriers to entry, the higher the marketability score will be.
As I’m sure you have guessed, it is not the result of either patentability or marketability alone that will lead to success for the patented product or service, but the combination of these two metrics that is the best predictor.
Thus, when there is high patentability and high marketability, the success likelihood is very high, and conversely, when there is low patentability and low marketability, success likelihood is low. As with most everything in life, there exists a gray area in between where judgement calls must be made.
Having this information and having done the analysis is what will allow you to make a very informed decision going forward in any case.
This long word answers the question, “How likely it is that an invention will be able to get granted patent rights at the USPTO?”
There is an important point about what the “invention” means. While an inventor may disclose in their written description and in their drawings the entirety of the functional invention, what matters in terms of patentability is the claims of the patent application.
Claims are what the applicant (through their Patent Attorney) state in words what they have invented and claim a right to as apart from any other reference or prior technology.
So, in other words, the invention is actually defined by the set of claims at the end of the patent application, not what is contained in the body of the patent or in the images/drawings.
These claims must be very carefully crafted to be as broad as possible without encroaching on any prior art or publications.
Novelty: Is your Invention New?
This is THE biggest question in patent law. It’s the simplest, and most straightforward part of the law and most everyone I talk with gets it right away.
In order to get a 20-year patent for your invention, you need to convince a USPTO examiner (that by the way looks at inventions of your type all day everyday) that you’re the FIRST EVER, in the WORLD.
Don’t be scared. As we mentioned above, the inquiry that the examiner is going to make is not whether EVERYTHING we describe in the specification and drawings is the first ever in the world – but instead, they will be looking at the CLAIMS of the invention to see whether what you are claiming is the first ever in the world, and that no one has ever done it before.
The USPTO examiner is assigned to a single art-unit. Art units are broken up into very specific different areas of technology. These examiners only review patent applications within a specific art unit.
They are trained at colleges/universities just like engineers or scientists are and then they are trained in the Manual of Patent Examination Procedure (MPEP) and (just like Patent Attorneys) they have to take and pass the daunting Patent Bar Examination. They know their stuff.
They know their field of technology so well, they know what applications are pending in foreign countries, the state of the art in general and even what problems are unsolved in the industry.
Your patent attorney is here to help. Crafting claim language is likely the most difficult thing to do with the English language. It’s the Patent Attorney’s responsibility to attempt to carve out in precise fashion what the inventor has created, and help it stand out as new/different from the state of the art as it is today.
Nonobviousness: Is my invention an obvious version of something else?
Don’t over-think this word. It simply means that the examiner must not think that your invention is just an obvious variation/version of something else that exists in the present day technology. This is just one step of the process that usually follows the novelty analysis.
The inquiry is that even if your invention is novel, and the examiner can’t find anything exactly like what you’ve claimed, if what you’ve claimed is an obvious iteration or variation of something else that’s already published, you will not get a patent granted.
Thus, you need to show the examiner in that case, that a person of ordinary skill in the technology would not have known to combine elements A and B, and that there was nothing to point to the combination of A and B.
Gaining a clear understanding of your market size, addressable market, and target market will help you and your team realize the true potential revenue that your innovation could bring.
While these types of research projects are never going to be guaranteed predictors of the future, they will help you the inventor make a very informed decision on whether to pull the trigger on spending time/money on a patent for your invention.
Working closely with someone who can help you predict revenue 3 or even 5 years down the road will help you build a strategy around cost structure so that you don’t go out of business before your product hits the market.
One of the most important aspects of our jobs as Attorneys is an ethical and moral obligation to help our clients succeed. Success can be defined in many ways, but in terms of dollars, we want our clients to be able to be commercially viable, making profits and most of all creating positive change in the world.
The whole point of inventing and publicizing your creations is so that we as a country and a world get smarter every day and help make each other’s lives safer, more efficient, and more enjoyable through innovations.
There is Too Much Risk, I’m Not Willing to Seek a Patent, Now What?
If after doing the hard work, and conducting Market Research, and after talking with your Patent Attorney, you decide that there is too much risk to go down the patent protection route (either based on legal/eligibility challenge or financial/market outlook), there are still alternatives for you to choose.
Protecting your innovations with trade secret protections is a great place to start.
Trade secret law is closely tied with employment law, and in summary, helps to prevent unauthorized disclosure of your company’s valuable information to third parties or the public at large. Trade secrets allow your company to have and maintain a competitive edge if the trade secret remains within your company.
There is work that needs to be done to keep trade secret status. But, remember, there is not a certificate or registration of a trade secret by any government body, only the ability to meritoriously sue someone who takes (misappropriates) your trade secret information.
Trade secret law is governed by each state; however, each state has adopted the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA) as part of their statute. In addition, in 2016, the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA) was adopted to provide for a federal remedy in federal court to address the sprawling nature of companies that exist in multiple states and employ many people across the country (if not the world).
To enforce your company’s trade secret rights, you must show three elements:
- The Trade Secret information must not be readily ascertainable (meaning not known in the public)
- The Trade Secret information must be actively kept a secret (modern encryption software, locks, access permissions, etc.)
- The Trade Secret information must be valuable to the company (usually shown by demonstrating the immediate value to a competitor)
There is a lot of power in trade secret protection.
One of the key insights here is that the duration of protection for a trade secret is theoretically in perpetuity (without end!), if the secret remains valuable, not known by the public, and efforts are being made to keep the secret – you can protect your innovations well beyond the 20 years that Patent Law affords you.
Watch this video series to learn more about trade secrets.
STEP 8- Filing your Patent Application
Filing the right application with the right information
There are a lot of different types of patent applications available for inventors. What’s nice is that there are some common threads that are true no matter what, and they are:
- The invention must be novel and nonobvious (as discussed above).
- Only one patent will issue for each invention.
- When you have been given patent rights, you can prevent others from making, using, or selling your invention.
Below I have provided a graph that shows you the process.
Please Note: A utility patent means the same thing as a non-provisional patent application (NPA).
Provisional Patent Application
A provisional patent application is an informal application that serves to preserve a filing date for an invention that must be followed up by a nonprovisional patent application within one year.
The provisional application will contain a specification and drawings, but usually not a claim set.
The beauty of a provisional is that it allows the inventor time to develop prototypes, take their invention to market and explore customer feedback before locking in the all-important claims of the patent application. A provisional application, by preserving the filing date, allows an inventor to legally state their invention is patent pending.
The America Invents Act of 2013 turned our country from a first-to-invent system to a first-to-file system. That means that it’s a literal race to see which inventor files the invention first (Assuming more than one inventor has the same/similar invention at the same time).
Nonprovisional Patent Application
This is the formal application that gets submitted and examined by the United States Patent and Trademark Office USPTO.
The application is formal because it must have specific sections within the specification and must have a properly formatted claim set. In addition, it must have drawings with proper formatting.
On top of the rigorous requirements for formality, a nonprovisional patent application must be submitted with a large stack of paperwork comprising an oath/declaration, invention disclosure statement, and an application data sheet. These documents will be outlined and explained in detail by your patent attorney or paralegal.
The Nonprovisional Application is the basis for all follow-on applications that we’re going to discuss later including divisionals, continuations, and international patent applications.
Divisional Patent Application
These types of applications must come after a Nonprovisional patent application – and usually come as the result of a restriction requirement office action.
When the patent office receives an application, one of the first things they will do is evaluate whether there are multiple inventions within the one claim set filed for.
Often times, the attorney submits a large claim set covering many different aspects of the invention – and in some cases, those are so different, that the examiner sees them as two or more patentably distinct subjects.
The rule is that you are only allowed ONE patent for ONE invention. Seems obvious, but many inventors forget about this when they submit their claims.
These applications are for those inventors that just can’t keep from, well… INVENTING (and re-inventing)! In other words, they have found improvements on their originally filed invention, and want to separately protect those improvements (bells & whistles I call it).
As long as those bells and whistles (improvements) to the base invention were described at least in part in the base nonprovisional filing, then you can file what is called a continuation or continuation in part patent application.
This is THE key way to build a patent portfolio.
A patent portfolio is a fancy term for more than one patent. If you go to try to license or sell your invention, a buyer or licensee will want to see that you have more than one claim set that covers your invention – it spreads out the potential infringing net and strengthens the overall schema.
The more claims and patents you have in your portfolio, generally, the more powerful and more difficult it will be to get around (by a competitor).
Design Patent Application
Very different from utility patent applications, design patent applications seek to protect purely the 3-dimensional SHAPE or ornamental appearance of the object/product/device.
Design patents (if granted) provide exclusive rights for only 14 years from the day of filing as opposed to 20 years for their utility counterparts.
You can do BOTH! Yes, you can (and for most hardware/devices you SHOULD) seek protection for both the utility – which protects the functionality, and the design – which protects the way it looks.
Watch the video below to learn more about how to patent a design patent.
These are quite rare, not necessarily because they are hard to acquire, but there is just less innovation in plants and botany.
The requirements for getting a plant patent are still the same for utility patents, although the major difference is that the eligibility only requires that they be non-tuber and asexually reproducible.
Don’t get weirded out by that – it just means that the plant must be able to be propagated in a lab-setting without the use of pollination (or nature) to procreate. Grafting, bonding, or otherwise combining plant tissue to form repeatable functional, and beneficial results through plants is patentable.
Genetically modified and/or genetically engineered foods are prime examples of potentially patentable plants or seeds.
Watch the video below to learn more about how to patent a plant patent.
If you are interested in learning a step by step process for filing your provisional patent application then make sure to check out my blog article “How to File Provisional Patent Application.“
International Patent Application
This is such an important topic – as many inventors overlook this, or even yet, don’t know to ask about it. When seeking patent protection from the USPTO, you can’t forget that it is only the “US” that you’re seeking rights for.
You should definitely consider getting patent protection in all countries that have a market demand for your product.
In some rare cases, US inventors (after doing a thorough marketability study) will actually be wise to seek patent protection in countries other than the US as that is where the customers are!
An international application that is common to use if the inventor is going to see protection in more than 3 countries is the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). This treaty allows the inventor up to 30 months to decide which foreign countries they want to file into while their US patent is pending.
The PCT also allows the inventor to save time/money by not having to pay for and wait for the patent search to come back from each country – instead, they will ALL recognize the US examiner’s search.
Learn how to expedite an international patent filing by watching the video below.
Knowing how to Navigate the Examiners and USPTO
Ok, so you have finally made the plunge, and filed your patent application! Congrats on this major milestone. I hate to break it to you… but you’re only halfway there. So, let’s keep going – you got this.
As soon as the application is filed, there are multiple eyes that see the spec, claims, and drawings and decide on which art unit to send it to. There are around 10 different art units and it is important only so much that it will determine who the examiner is that will be assigned to the invention.
Once you get assigned an examiner – you are STUCK with them, for better or worse! So, better make nice.
This term reflects any and all correspondence that may be received from the USPTO after submitting the patent application. These office actions can be anything from merely procedural typo corrections to substantive rejections or objections.
The most common first office action is a restriction requirement office action – this means that the examiner sees that there is actually more than one invention in the claim set.
This can be a good thing!
A response can be as simple as electing the main embodiment of your invention, and then filing a divisional application to cover the remainder – more on divisionals later.
Typical office actions that are “on the merits” are those that you really need to watch out for. These rejections, objections, or allowances are the results that come after an examiner has done their own searching, and has come up with their determination on whether they will allow the patent application to go through to issuance.
It is typical to get at least one rejection – so don’t be saddened if your patent application gets a non-final or even a final office action. They are in most cases, able to be overcome with some combination of legal argument or amendments.
Watch the video below to learn more about patent office actions.
There’s nothing like being face to face (or at least ear-to-ear – if over the phone) with the examiner. So much in today’s world (including the patent office) is done through electronic communication, email and exchanges that lack the human quality.
An interview can make up SO much ground, where there may have been some emotion growing on either side, a personal human conversation can smooth all of that out.
It’s great to know that an examiner’s job is to simply apply the rules the patent office passes down. A level-headed, objective approach to working with them is always going to win the day versus an adversarial, judgmental and emotional approach.
Petitions and Appeals
It happens. Sometimes, examiners just don’t see eye-to-eye with inventors and their attorneys. And because of a technical or process reason, there is a need to escalate the examination to a higher authority.
However, most petitions are process-based and have pre-designed objectives whether it is for moving up the application (example is making an application special based on the age of the inventor, or other circumstance), or allowing certain exceptions to rules that are out of the hands of the individual examiner.
Petitions serve just this purpose. By petitioning to the art-unit director – the inventor is able to achieve at least another set of eyes on the legal argument, patent prosecution history in an attempt to get their patent considered for granting.
In other cases, when the examiner has made an error or substantively disagrees about the novelty, non-obviousness or utility of an invention – the examiner’s decision can be appealed to the patent trial and appeal board (PTAB).
What the video below to better understand the patent trial and appeal board (PTAB).
The PTAB sees patent decisions all day, and the judges on the panel are experts at parsing good from bad legal arguments against examiners. While it is rare, appeals can serve to help inventors get patent rights, where the examiner would have rejected them.
Building a Patent Portfolio During Prosecution
While a patent is still pending, a portfolio can (and should) be created. The primary way, as mentioned before is by creating at least one or more divisional applications when there is a restriction requirement separating claim sets.
Another great way to create additional parallel patents covering a technology is to file continuation applications when the inventor has improvements on their invention that come up after filing the original nonprovisional patent application.
These continuations will stand on their own, and the improvements need to be substantial enough so that they will not be simply considered obvious variants of the underlying nonprovisional application.
Both divisional and continuation applications will undergo separate examination (not necessarily by the same examiner – but usually they are). And have completely separate issue dates, and authority for claiming/allowing.
Notice of Allowance and Patent Granted: You made it!
Congratulations – once you respond to the last office action and the examiner is satisfied, they will send back what is called a Notice of Allowance, and that is when the champagne bottles should pop! You’ve been told by the patent office that your invention is worthy of being granted.
The reason why they provide you notice of allowance, is to give you a chance to file those continuation applications to complete the patent portfolio. It’s your last call to submit any other improvements or variations that were not covered by the base invention.
After you pay your issue fee, the USPTO will GRANT YOUR PATENT RIGHTS! They will send you a hard ribbon copy of your patent, as granted and provide you with the official patent number and date. Congratulations again!!!
There is so much more to come after you’ve received your patent – we will save that for another blog article (or two).
In Conclusion: Follow These 13-Steps To Get a Patent For Your Idea
Remember that ideas are a dime-a-dozen. It’s your courage to take the idea to the next level that makes you stand out from the rest of the inventors.
Follow these 13-steps to protect and bring to market your visionary idea. (Click on any of the links below to revisit that particular section)
- Do you have an idea or invention?
- Is your patent eligible?
- Determine who the inventors are and who will own it.
- What are your goals?
- Are you barred from patenting?
- Patent success matrix – patentability
- Patent success matrix – marketability
- Filing your patent application
- International Patent Applications
- Patent Prosecution: Office Actions
- Escalation: Petitions & Appeals
- Creating Portfolios: Divisional and Continuation Applications.
- Patent Granted!
Because you are up for the challenge, I encourage you to book a free consultation with us where we will also provide you with our Bold Patents The Inventor’s Guide to Patents book free of charge! (Click here to get started today!)
What did you think of the article? What questions do you have about protecting and bringing to market your visionary idea? Please let me know in the comments below! I am here to help!
Legal Note: This blog article does not constitute as legal advice. Although the article was written by a licensed USPTO patent attorney there are many factors and complexities that come into patenting an idea. We recommend you consult a lawyer if you want legal advice for your particular situation. No attorney-client or confidential relationship exists by simply reading and applying the steps stated in this blog article.