Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
By J.D. Houvener
Patent Attorney and Founder

If I design a logo for someone, say, for a clothing brand, should I charge a one-time fee or take a small percentage of each item sold?

That’s a fair question. From a legal standpoint, I usually represent trademark owners, so I tend to favor the idea that once a client pays for a logo, they should own it outright. But really, this isn’t just a trademark issue; it’s more of a contract question.

You can structure it however you want. If both sides agree, you could ask for 1%, 5%, or even 10% of sales. The problem? That setup usually turns into a management nightmare. You’d have to track every sale, trust the reports, and constantly follow up to make sure you’re getting paid correctly. Most designers don’t want that kind of hassle, and neither do their clients.

That’s why most people use what’s called a “Work Made for Hire” agreement. It’s simple:

  • The client pays you upfront for your creative work.
  • You hand over full ownership of the logo once payment is made.

It’s clean, predictable, and avoids future disputes.

If you want to protect yourself, make sure your agreement spells out the scope of work, payment terms, and ownership transfer clearly. That way, everyone knows exactly what they’re getting, and no one has to chase down percentages later.

About the Author
J.D. Houvener is a Registered USPTO Patent Attorney who has a strong interest in helping entrepreneurs and businesses thrive. J.D. leverages his technical background in engineering and experience in the aerospace industry to provide businesses with a unique perspective on their patent needs. He works with clients who are serious about investing in their intellectual assets and provides counsel on how to capitalize their patents in the market. If you have any questions regarding this article or patents in general, consider contacting J.D. Houvener at https://boldip.com/contact/