AI generated
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on LinkedIn
By J.D. Houvener
Patent Attorney and Founder

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer a figment of science fiction but a transformative force that has begun to reshape various facets of our lives. From self-driving cars to personalized healthcare, AI’s capabilities are vast and continually expanding. As these intelligent systems evolve, they are not just aiding human inventors but are increasingly contributing to the creation of novel technologies themselves. 

The expanding capabilities of AI raises an intriguing yet complicated question: can AI be an inventor under existing patent laws? As AI systems edge closer to autonomous creativity and problem-solving, understanding how patent laws adapt to this new form of inventorship is both crucial and timely. Whether you are an innovator, a legal practitioner, or simply a technology enthusiast, delving into the future of AI inventorship and patent laws provides valuable insights into the changing landscape of innovation and intellectual property.

The Traditional Inventorship Model and Patent Laws

In the traditional inventorship model, an inventor is generally defined as a human being who contributes to the conception of an invention. This human-centric approach to inventing is embedded in patent laws, which were designed to grant inventors exclusive rights to their creations for a set period. The premise is straightforward: if you, as a human inventor, come up with a novel and non-obvious idea, you can apply for a patent to protect that idea from being used or sold by others without your permission. The key elements for patentability—novelty, utility, and non-obviousness—serve as the cornerstone to determine whether an invention merits legal protection.

Given that traditional patent laws are structured around human ingenuity, they also inherently link the concept of inventorship to accountability and ethical considerations. When a person or a group of people are credited with an invention, they are not just claiming the intellectual property but also taking responsibility for the ethical and societal implications of their invention. However, as we move into an era of AI-driven innovations, the question arises: do existing laws suffice, or do we need a paradigm shift in our understanding of what constitutes an “inventor”?

The Rise of AI Inventors

Artificial Intelligence has seen an astronomical rise in its capabilities, enabling it to participate in tasks that were once exclusively human domains, including the creation of new technologies. AI algorithms can now design complex chemical structures for new drugs, optimize engineering designs, and even compose music or create art. These aren’t just incremental improvements on existing technologies; often, they are novel solutions that can outperform or complement human-created alternatives. As AI continues to advance, the lines between human and machine-generated inventions are becoming increasingly blurred.

The rise of AI as potential inventors has opened up a Pandora’s box of legal and ethical questions. If an AI system develops a groundbreaking new technology, who owns the patent? Is it the developers who created the AI, the owners of the machine, or should the AI itself be recognized as the inventor? These questions challenge the very fabric of existing patent laws, which are built on a human-centric model of innovation. As AI systems become more autonomous in their ability to innovate, the need for a legal framework that can adapt to this new paradigm is becoming increasingly urgent.

Legal Challenges and the Current State of Affairs

The legal landscape has yet to fully adapt to the emergence of AI as potential inventors, leading to a host of challenges. Traditional patent laws are clear in attributing inventorship to humans, but they are silent on the issue of non-human inventors. Consequently, some patent offices around the world have denied patent applications where an AI is listed as the inventor, on the grounds that the law does not recognize non-human entities in this capacity. This lack of legal clarity could stifle innovation, as it raises uncertainties about the ownership and control of AI-generated inventions.

Recent cases and regulatory initiatives have sought to address these gaps, but there’s still much work to be done. There are ongoing discussions and legal battles in various forums to determine whether AI can, or should, be recognized as an inventor. The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has hosted two public meetings in 2023 seeking input on the current state of AI technologies and related inventorship issues and on stakeholders’ views on AI inventorship for patents. The U.S. Senate has also recently held hearings on AI and patents. Lawmakers and legal scholars are debating potential amendments to patent laws to account for the unique challenges posed by AI. Although a definitive global standard is yet to be established, the current state of affairs signals a period of transition and provides a fertile ground for legal innovation in the area of intellectual property rights for AI-generated inventions.

The Future: Potential Scenarios and Legal Frameworks

As we look to the future, we can envision several potential scenarios regarding AI inventorship and the legal frameworks that govern it. One possibility is the development of new laws that allow for “co-inventorship” between humans and AI systems. This would mean that both human developers and the AI itself share in the credit and responsibilities tied to a particular invention. Another scenario might involve the creation of a unique class of patents specifically for AI-generated inventions, which could have different conditions and terms compared to traditional patents. These special patent categories might, for example, have shorter expiration terms given the rapid pace of technological advancement in the AI field.

Internationally, we might see an effort towards the harmonization of patent laws relating to AI inventorship. As AI technologies are often collaborative and multi-national endeavors, having a consistent global legal framework could promote innovation and reduce friction. Such international alignment could come in the form of treaties, or through guidance from international organizations like the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). Regardless of the exact path forward, it is becoming increasingly clear that current patent laws will need to evolve to accommodate the revolutionary impact of AI on invention.

The Future of AI Inventorship

The intersection of AI and patent laws presents both challenges and opportunities for innovation in our rapidly evolving technological landscape. As AI systems continue to contribute to the creation of novel technologies, it becomes imperative that our legal frameworks adapt to this new form of inventorship. 

If you have questions about AI inventorship and how it impacts you, reach out to our attorneys at Bold Patents today. We are well-versed in the complexities that are arising in the field of AI and patent law and can help you effectively navigate this emerging area.

About the Author
J.D. Houvener is a Registered USPTO Patent Attorney who has a strong interest in helping entrepreneurs and businesses thrive. J.D. leverages his technical background in engineering and experience in the aerospace industry to provide businesses with a unique perspective on their patent needs. He works with clients who are serious about investing in their intellectual assets and provides counsel on how to capitalize their patents in the market. If you have any questions regarding this article or patents in general, consider contacting J.D. at